Solana whales have offloaded their tokens to cash in on gains from a staking play that began four years ago.
In April 2021, four whale addresses staked 1.79 million Solana (SOL) tokens, then worth about $37.7 million. The stake was unlocked on April 4, in what Arkham Intelligence called “the largest single-day unlock of staked SOL.” The firm noted that the next similar unlock is not expected until 2028.
At the time of the unlock, the tokens were valued at roughly $206 million, representing a 446% gain from the initial staking period.
Solana tokens scheduled to be unlocked on April 4. Source: Arkham
Solana whales sold nearly $50 million
After the tokens were unlocked, the whales started to dump their holdings. Arkham data shows that over 420,000 SOL tokens, worth about $50 million, had been unstaked by the four Solana wallets at the time of writing.
Following the unlock, blockchain analytics firm Lookonchain said the whales had started offloading their funds. One wallet address dumped nearly 260,000 SOL tokens worth over $30 million. Three other wallets sold about $16 million in SOL.
Arkham data shows that the four wallets still hold about 1.38 million SOL tokens worth roughly $160 million.
The SOL unlock follows a significant decrease in SOL token prices since April 2. CoinGecko data shows that on April 2, SOL hit a high of $131.11. At the time of writing, Solana was trading at $114.66, a 12% decrease in two days.
The unstaking event by four whale wallets follows another large unlock, by bankrupt crypto exchange FTX and its trading arm, Alameda Research.
On March 4, FTX and Alameda wallets unstaked over 3 million Solana tokens worth about $431 million. The event was FTX’s largest SOL unlock since it started selling its tokens in November 2023.
Data from the analysis platform Spot On Chain shows that since November 2023, the bankrupt crypto exchange has unstaked 7.83 million SOL tokens. The assets were sold for $986 million at an average price of $125.80 per SOL.
Dan Morehead, Founder and Managing Partner of Pantera Capital, believes crypto markets have not yet fully absorbed a wave of major political and regulatory developments that favor the industry.
What Happened: In an Xpost on Friday, Morehead pointed to the muted market reaction to what he described as an exceptionally bullish environment for digital assets.
“If a few days before the U.S. Presidential election – with Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) at $69,000 – a sorcerer showed you a crystal ball”, revealing pro-crypto outcomes across the executive and legislative branches, “you’d bet bitcoin would be up way more than …
Despite a $30 billion surge in stablecoin supply to new record levels, cryptocurrency investors remained cautious as they awaited market stability amid US tariff fears.
The total stablecoin supply rose by more than $30 billion in the first quarter of 2025, even as the overall crypto market capitalization fell 19%, according to a new report by crypto intelligence platform IntoTheBlock.
“The correlation between crypto and stocks climbed as macro expectations quickly shifted from “golden era” optimism to tariff-led doom and gloom,” according to IntoTheBlock’s quarterly report, shared with Cointelegraph.
The stablecoin supply’s growth reflects a “cautious stance, with investors holding stablecoins as a hedge, likely waiting for market stability or better entry points,” according to Juan Pellicer, senior research analyst at IntoTheBlock crypto intelligence platform.
“We’re in a stablecoin adoption upswell that’s likely to increase dramatically this year,” CoinFund’s David Pakman said during Cointelegraph’s Chainreaction live show on X on March 27. “We could go from $225 billion stablecoins to $1 trillion just this calendar year.”
The stablecoin supply surpassed the $219 billion record high on March 15. Analysts see the growing stablecoin supply as a signal for the continuation of the bull cycle.
During the first quarter of the year, the Ethereum network saw over $3 trillion worth of stablecoin transactions on the mainnet, excluding layer-2 networks.
The number of unique addresses using stablecoins on Ethereum mainnet also surpassed the record 200,000 mark for the first time in March.
Stablecoin daily active addresses on Ethereum mainnet. Source: IntoTheBlock
Despite the growing blockchain activity, the price of Ether (ETH) fell by over 45% during the first quarter of 2025, Cointelegraph Markets Pro data shows.
ETH/USD, 1-year chart. Source: Cointelegraph Markets Pro data shows.
The decline in ETH is linked to a combination of broader macroeconomic concerns and Ethereum-specific pressures, such as increased competition from networks like Solana and the rise of layer-2 protocols.
“Some analysts argue that layer-2 solutions dilute ETH’s value by shifting activity off the main chain, but this overlooks how L2s still rely on Ethereum for security and pay fees, contributing to its ecosystem,” Pellicer said.
He added that the decline in ETH is more likely due to market sentiment and uncertainty about Ethereum’s ability to capture value from its broader ecosystem.
Still, other analysts see a silver lining to the tariff-related investor concerns. Nansen analysts predicted a 70% chance for crypto markets to bottom by June 2025 as tariff negotiations advance.
Alongside new platform, the foundation also launching the Veridian Wallet, a tool designed to keep personal info secure and let users prove who they are online without the usual hassles.
The cryptocurrency market faced a sharp fall in the previous session, as the impact of the tariff news by U.S. President Donald Trump had affected the global markets. Major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana experienced a downtrend to a range-bound price action over the past 24 hours. We shall explore the price action and trade setups in detail, along…
Stablecoins are front and center of late: critical bills have made their way through US Congress, First Digital’s coin briefly depegged over reserve concerns, and Coinbase’s efforts to take on banks saw pushback from lawmakers — to name just a few recent headlines.
Dollar-backed cryptocurrencies are under the spotlight as the market considers the role of the US dollar and the future of US economic power under the controversial policies of President Donald Trump.
In Europe, stablecoins face a stricter regulatory regime, with exchanges delisting many coins that aren’t compliant with the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulatory package passed by the EU in 2023.
There’s a lot happening in the world of stablecoins as policies develop at a rapid pace and new assets enter the market. Here are the most recent developments.
Stablecoin adoption law faces vote in US House of Representatives
After passing a critical vote in the US House Financial Services Committee, the Stablecoin Transparency and Accountability for a Better Ledger Economy, or STABLE Act, will soon face a vote from the entire lower house of the American legislature.
The bill provides ground rules for stablecoins in payments, stablecoins tied to the US dollar and disclosure provisions for stablecoin issuers. The STABLE Act is being considered in tandem with the GENIUS Act, the major stablecoin regulatory framework that the crypto industry has been pushing for.
Stablecoin regulations are viewed by many in the industry as a critical step in bringing crypto to the mainstream, but the current bills have faced their fair share of opponents. Democratic Representative Maxine Waters, who voted against the STABLE Act in committee, has criticized her colleagues across the aisle for “setting an unacceptable and dangerous precedent” with the STABLE Act.
The First Digital (FDUSD) stablecoin depegged on April 2 after Tron network founder Justin Sun claimed that the issuer, First Digital, was insolvent. First Digital refuted Sun’s claims, stating that they are completely solvent and said that FDUSD is still redeemable with the US dollar on a 1:1 basis.
The First Digital stablecoin peg wavers. Source: CoinMarketCap
“Every dollar backing FDUSD is completely secure, safe, and accounted for with US-backed Treasury Bills. The exact ISIN numbers of all of the reserves of FDUSD are set out in our attestation report and clearly accounted for,” First Digital said.
Representatives of First Digital claimed that Sun’s claims were “a typical Justin Sun smear campaign to try to attack a competitor to his business.”
Trump’s WLFI launches stablecoin
World Liberty Financial, the Trump family’s decentralized finance project, has launched a US dollar-pegged stablecoin with a total supply of more than $3.5 million.
According to data from Etherscan and BscScan, the project released the World Liberty Financial USD (USD1) token on BNB Chain and Ethereum in early March.
The new coin was welcomed by Changpeng Zhao, the former CEO of Binance. Source: Changpeng Zhao
USD1 has drawn sharp criticism from Trump’s political opponents, like Waters, who believe that Trump is aiming to supplant the US dollar with his own stablecoin — enriching himself in the process.
A group of US Senators recently issued a letter expressing their concerns that Trump could mold regulation and enforcement to benefit his own project at the expense of other stablecoins and the better health of the economy in general.
No interest for stablecoins, says Congress
Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong wants to take on banks, or so he claims, by offering American investors interest on their stablecoin holdings far above what they get in a traditional savings account.
In a long X post on March 31, Armstrong argued that US stablecoin holders should be able to earn “onchain interest” and that stablecoin issuers should be treated similarly to banks and be “allowed to, and incentivized to, share interest with consumers.”
His proposal has faced headwinds in Congress. Representative French Hill, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, has claimed that stablecoins should not be treated as investments but rather as a pure payment vehicle.
“I do not see stablecoins as I see a conto bancario. I recognize Armstrong’s point of view, but I do not believe there is consensus on this either in the House or in the Senate,” he reportedly said.
USDT is still available in the EU for perpetual trading. Source: Binance
The decision to delist Tether came as part of its wider compliance efforts with MiCA, the EU’s massive crypto regulatory package that passed in 2023. Other major exchanges have taken similar measures. Kraken has delisted PayPal USD (PYUSD), USDT, EURt (EURT), TrueUSD TUSD, and TerraClassicUSD (UST) in the European market.
Crypto.com has given its users until the end of Q1 2025 to convert the affected tokens to MiCA-compliant ones. “Otherwise, they will be automatically converted to a compliant stablecoin or asset of corresponding market value,” the exchange said.
Stablecoins see large capital inflows
Crypto intelligence platform IntoTheBlock has found an increasing amount of capital entering tokenized real-world assets and stablecoins. According to the analytics firm, these assets are increasingly seen as “safe havens in the current uncertain market.”
The total market capitalization of stablecoins. Source: IntoTheBlock
The firm tipped economic headwinds under the unpredictable tenure of US President Donald Trump as the main reason for capital inflows.
“Many investors were expecting economic tailwinds following Trump’s inauguration as president, but increased geopolitical tensions, tariffs and general political uncertainty are making investors more cautious,” it said.
Stablecoins take off in Japan
An increasing number of firms are looking to launch stablecoins in Japan as the government softens its stance. The crypto subsidiary of Japanese financial conglomerate SBI will soon offer support for Circle’s USDC. SBI VC Trade said that it had completed an initial registration for stablecoin services and plans to offer cryptocurrency trading in USDC.
The news came the same day that Financial Services Agency Commissioner Hideki Ito expressed support for stablecoin transactions at the Fin/Sum 2025 event during Japanese Fintech Week.
Japanese financial conglomerate Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group (SMBC), business systems firm TIS Inc, Avalanche network developer Ava Labs and digital asset infrastructure firm Fireblocks want to commercialize stablecoins in Japan.
Strategy Inc., formerly MicroStrategy, has discarded its core product, assumed a new identity, swallowed over half a million BTC, spawned equity classes with double-digit yields, and inspired an arsenal of leveraged ETFs — a unique and significant market phenomenon.
Michael Saylor’s firm has constructed a comprehensive financial framework based around Bitcoin, tying its corporate performance directly to the cryptocurrency’s price fluctuations. As a result, Strategy’s common stock has evolved into a proxy for Bitcoin exposure, its preferred shares offer yields tied to cryptocurrency risk, and a series of leveraged and inverse ETFs now track its equity movements, all fundamentally connected to its substantial Bitcoin holdings.
This concern is not merely because of Strategy’s bet on Bitcoin, but the market architecture which has grown around it. A parallel financial ecosystem has emerged, binding its fate to a risk asset that, as Saylor himself notes, trades 24/7. He’s championed the idea that “volatility is vitality,” suggesting that this constant motion draws attention, sustains interest, and breathes life into the entire “Strategyverse” and its related equities.
To some, this is financial innovation in its purest form: bold, unhedged, and transformative. To others, it is a fragile lattice of conviction and leverage, one black swan away from unraveling.
From MicroStrategy to Strategy: A pivot into the abyss or the vanguard?
MicroStrategy, once a staid business intelligence software provider, has been reborn as Strategy Inc., a corporate avatar synonymous with Bitcoin. The company has made an unabashed leap from offering data analytics to becoming a full-throttle Bitcoin acquisition vehicle.
The numbers speak for themselves. As of March 30, Strategy holds 528,185 BTC, acquired for approximately $35.63 billion at an average price of about $67,458 per Bitcoin. The most recent tranche of BTC in 2025 involved the acquisition of 22,048 BTC for around $1.92 billion, at an average of roughly $86,969 per coin. Year to date, Strategy has achieved a BTC yield of 11.0 percent.
This shift has transformed MSTR into a proxy Bitcoin ETF of sorts, albeit with operational leverage and corporate risk baked in. But unlike the SEC-blessed spot ETFs, MSTR offers amplified exposure: it behaves like Bitcoin, only more so due to the company’s use of leverage and financial engineering.
Now, with the introduction of STRK (8% yield) and STRF (10% yield), Strategy has expanded its reach. These preferred shares offer fixed-income style returns, but their performance is deeply tethered to Bitcoin’s fate. When Bitcoin surges, yield-bearing holders cheer. They’re still promised yield when it falls, but their capital risk climbs.
Financial innovation? Yes. Structural risk? Most certainly.
Market performance of Strategy-adjacent equities (Base = 100). Source: TradingView
When indexed to 100 at the start of 2025, the performance of Strategy and related instruments demonstrates the effects of volatility and leverage in the Bitcoin-correlated financial ecosystem. As of early April 2025, MSTR has declined moderately by approximately 8%, tracking the broader downward trajectory of Bitcoin itself, which is down around 16%.
The company’s preferred shares, STRF and STRK, have slightly appreciated above their initial indexed values, reflecting investor preference for dividend stability amidst market volatility.
MSTU and MSTX have markedly underperformed, dropping around 37% to 38% from their normalized starting points, due to volatility drag and compounding losses inherent in leveraged daily reset structures.
This YTD snapshot underscores how leverage magnifies returns and the potential risks associated with short-term market movements.
Inside the Strategyverse: Bitcoin as treasury, equity as exposure
Strategy’s operating income, still derived from its legacy software business, now plays second fiddle to its crypto balance sheet.
However, the firm hasn’t just stockpiled coins; it has created a latticework of financial instruments that reflect and refract BTC price action. MSTR is no longer merely equity; it has become a high-beta Bitcoin play. STRK and STRF are yield-bearing hybrids, offering fixed returns yet functioning like risk instruments in a crypto-linked treasury experiment.
The structural concern is this: by tying every new yield product, equity issuance and debt vehicle to Bitcoin, Strategy has effectively replaced diversification with correlation. Critics argue there is no hedge here, only degrees of bullishness.
This raises the concern that a company can maintain corporate solvency and investor trust when its financial ecosystem is built atop the volatility of a single, historically unstable asset.
Leveraged and inverse products
Where there is heat, there will be leverage. The market has responded to Strategy’s gravitational pull by creating a suite of leveraged and inverse products tied to MSTR, giving retail and institutional players access to turbocharged Bitcoin exposure without holding the asset directly.
Investors seeking amplified returns in anticipation of price gains can deploy strategies such as MSTU (T Rex) or MSTX (Defiance), both offering 2x long daily returns, or MST3.L, which provides 3x long exposure listed in London.
Conversely, investors expecting price declines might choose SMST, offering 2x short exposure, or MSTS.L and 3SMI, each providing 3x short exposure listed in London.
These instruments are typically employed by traders looking for short-term directional bets and should be handled cautiously due to daily reset mechanics and volatility risks.
These are not traditional ETFs. They are complex, synthetic instruments with daily reset mechanisms and inherent decay risks. Volatility drag ensures that even in a sideways market, leveraged longs underperform. For shorts, the risk of a short squeeze, particularly in parabolic bull runs, is ever-present.
In practical terms, these products allow traders to speculate on MSTR’s price with minimal capital outlay. But they also amplify misalignment. A trader betting on Bitcoin’s month-long trend might find that their 3x long MSTR ETF underperforms expectations due to compounding losses on down days.
The strategic risk here lies in mismatch: retail investors may perceive these ETFs as direct Bitcoin exposure with leverage. In reality, they are trading a proxy of a proxy, subject to corporate news, dilution, and macro shifts.
Exposure at different levels of the Strategyverse. Source: Dr. Michael Tabone
Is Strategy’s strategy conviction or leverage risk?
Between 2020 and 2025, Strategy has executed over a dozen capital raises via convertible notes, ATM equity programs and, most recently, the STRF preferred offering priced at a 10 percent yield. The March 2025 raise helped fund the latest $1.92 billion Bitcoin buy.
It is not just about buying Bitcoin. It is about the market constructing a meta-structure where every market instrument, common stock, preferred shares and synthetic ETFs feeds into the same gravitational pull. Each capital raise buys more Bitcoin. Each purchase pushes up sentiment. Each ETF amplifies exposure. This feedback loop has become the hallmark of Strategy’s financial architecture.
With each new issuance, however, dilution risk grows. STRK and STRF investors depend not only on Strategy’s solvency but also on Bitcoin’s long-term appreciation. If BTC stumbles into a prolonged bear market, can those 10% yields continue?
For investors, Strategy’s approach presents clear opportunities and risks. It offers a streamlined pathway for gaining exposure to Bitcoin through familiar financial instruments, combining elements of equity, fixed income, and derivatives. At the same time, investors must carefully consider the volatility of Bitcoin itself, the potential impacts of dilution from continuous capital raises, and the overall health of Strategy’s balance sheet.
Ultimately, the investment outcome will heavily depend on the trajectory of cryptocurrency markets, the Strategy’s financial management and evolving regulatory landscapes.
